A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE WADSWORTH BOULEVARD RIGHT- OF-WAY WITHIN MANDALAY GARDENS SUBDIVISION
Official status: Second Reading
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
To vacate an unused portion of the Wadsworth Boulevard right-of-way near W. 103rd Avenue to facilitate development of the adjacent property while retaining an easement for access and utilities.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2026 | City Council | Passed on first reading — Summary of Proceedings |
| 10/26/2026 | City Council | Approved on second reading — Summary of Proceedings |
Recorded votes
- 10/12/2026 — City Council: “Pass Councillor's Bill No. 46 on first reading to authorize the vacation of a portion of the Wadsworth Boulevard right-of-way within Mandalay Gardens Subdivision, contingent upon City Council approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for Mandalay Gardens Smiles 4 Miles Employment Flex Proposal. 6:0” — the motion passed on a vote of 6–0.
Full text
Official record
Source: City of Westminster — City Council vote traces and Summaries of Proceedings (westminsterco.gov DocumentCenter) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
6a5f45b9f7fe8edb1818ba0de7a03910caa41229a5e91e8e913fc65b4b3de164
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.