A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE 2026 BUDGET OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND AND AUTHORIZING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FROM THE 2026 ESTIMATED REVENUES IN THE FUND
Official status: First Reading
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
To appropriate the City's 2026 CDBG allocation from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development into the City budget to fund eligible community development activities.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2026 | City Council | Passed on first reading — Summary of Proceedings |
Recorded votes
- 07/13/2026 — City Council: “Pass Councillor's Bill No. 23 on first reading for a supplemental appropriation of funds to the 2026 Budget of the Community Development Block Grant Fund. 7:0” — the motion passed on a vote of 7–0.
Full text
Official record
Source: City of Westminster — City Council vote traces and Summaries of Proceedings (westminsterco.gov DocumentCenter) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
1afc2747765e378ab69601be16b57a47a20f6ebefe4451d435f7823a127a9075
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.