A Resolution Approving the Amendment to the Agreement Regarding Design and Construction of Drainage and Flood Control Improvements for Cherry Creek at Mainstreet (Agreement No. 25-08.17A, Project No. 110510) By and Between Urban Drainage and Flood Control District d/b/a Mile High Flood District and the Town of Parker
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
The Town of Parker, the Mile High Flood District (MHFD), and the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority (CCBWQA) have identified Cherry Creek at Mainstreet as a reach of major drainageway requiring repair and rehabilitation to support existing and future Town growth. The Town, MHFD, and CCBWQA intend to partner in funding and managing the design and construction of the improvements by executing an intergovernmental agreement (IGA).
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 05/04/2026 | Town Council | Listed on the Town Council agenda — Consent Agenda |
Full text
Official record
Town of Parker — Town Council meetings, CivicClerk (parkerco.portal.civicclerk.com)
Source: Town of Parker — Town Council meetings, CivicClerk (parkerco.portal.civicclerk.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
ba7a9d8d327b22bf605b93c651074fb432246865d4c5b5445a16985418005ee1
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.