A Resolution Accepting the Donation of Tahoma 31 Low-Water Turf and Installation Services at Salisbury Regional Park Field #4 for Sustainability Purposes
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Parks and Recreation staff request Town Council approval of Resolution No. 26-016 to accept a donation from Green Valley Turf Co. valued at $54,000 for the installation of Tahoma 31 turf on Salisbury Regional Park Field #4. This pilot project will allow the Town to evaluate a water-efficient, warm-season turf alternative designed for arid conditions while minimizing financial and operational risk. Results from the trial will inform future decisions regarding sustainable turf management and potential broader applications within the Parks system.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2026 | Town Council | Listed on the Town Council agenda — Resolutions |
Recorded votes
- 02/02/2026 — Town Council: “Approve Resolution No. 26-016, as part of the regular agenda” — the motion passed on a vote of 5–0.
Full text
Official record
Town of Parker — Town Council meetings, CivicClerk (parkerco.portal.civicclerk.com)
Source: Town of Parker — Town Council meetings, CivicClerk (parkerco.portal.civicclerk.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
ee273cc5ab24374004451abcb8cf78957c5eaa6dc96a4c8f75d3b3105da6e9e0
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.