A Bill for an Ordinance Conveying Certain Real Property by Quit Claim Deed for Tracts G and H, Newlin Crossing Filing No. 3 to 98 W. Parker, LLLP
Official status: Second Reading
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
This ordinance proposes to quit claim Tracts G and H, Newlin Crossing Filing No. 3 to 98 W. Parker, LLLP. This is being proposed to clarify ownership of these commercial parcels with the Douglas County Assessor following transfers of parcels by plats associated with the Newlin Crossing development.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2026 | Town Council | Listed on the Town Council agenda — Consent Agenda |
| 04/20/2026 | Town Council | Listed on the Town Council agenda — Ordinances |
Recorded votes
- 04/20/2026 — Town Council: “Approve Ordinance No. 1.670 on second reading” — the motion passed on a vote of 6–0.
Full text
Official record
Town of Parker — Town Council meetings, CivicClerk (parkerco.portal.civicclerk.com)
Source: Town of Parker — Town Council meetings, CivicClerk (parkerco.portal.civicclerk.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
b15309b6b65095a60f050a472cc7c94697edce8f8d74ddde6abb3dacacd36cbf
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.