An Ordinance Amending Greenwood Village Municipal Code Section 2-11-30 Regarding Vacancies on the City Employee and Commissioned Officers Retirement Board ("Retirement Board")
Official status: Second Reading
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Staff is requesting City Council consider an amendment to the Municipal Code to allow an elected alternate member of the Retirement Board to be appointed to a regular elected position in the event of a vacancy, in order to maintain quorum and continuity of operations.<br><br>
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Ordinances and Resolutions |
| 03/02/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent |
Recorded votes
- 02/02/2026 — City Council: “Adopt” — the motion passed on a vote of 8–0.
Full text
Official record
Source: City of Greenwood Village — City Council meetings, CivicClerk (greenwoodvillageco.portal.civicclerk.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
e4f58218b5b238988b02bc59dd94ac088ef348c9b226bb34536a649449c9e2ca
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.