A resolution approving a proposed Agreement between the City and County of Denver and Passur Aerospace Inc. for landing fee billing software license and support services at Denver International Airport.
Official status: Approval Review
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Approves a contract with PASSUR Aerospace Inc. for $600,000.00 and for two years plus three, one-year options to extend, for landing fee billing services to support operations at Denver International Airport, in Council District 11 (PLANE-202685414).
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2026 | Transportation and Infrastructure | Council Resolution 26-1517 was approved by consent. |
Full text
Official record
City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)
Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
9c8e1aca63338a0902a0f87aca750ba9f1563526e1a37a06876dcecfc5204285
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.