A resolution authorizing and approving the expenditure and payment from the appropriation account designated “liability claims,” the sum of One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($125,000.00) made payable to Salazar Law, LLC f/b/a Tatiana Feigenblatt, in full payment and satisfaction of all claims related to the civil action captioned Tatiana Feigenblatt-Blazquez v. City and County of Denver and Dominick Salinas, which was filed in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, Case No. 2023CV32901.
Official status: Adopted
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
A resolution authorizing and approving the expenditure and payment from the appropriation account designated “liability claims,” the sum of One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($125,000.00) made payable to Salazar Law, LLC f/b/a Tatiana Feigenblatt, in full payment and satisfaction of all claims related to the civil action captioned Tatiana Feigenblatt-Blazquez v. City and County of Denver and Dominick Salinas, which was filed in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, Case No. 2023CV32901. Settles a claim involving the Denver Police Department. This item was approved for filing at the Mayor Council meeting on 8-25-2026.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2026 | City Council | A motion offered by Council President Pro-Tem Gonzales-Gutierrez, duly seconded by Council member Flynn, that Council Resolution 26-1268 be adopted en bloc, carried by the following vote: |
| 08/31/2026 | Council President | signed |
Full text
Official record
City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)
Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
1a4ddee94f70aa54d98f9daf644ec95c8f327092ac562bd0dbde6d58f222eb06
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.