A resolution authorizing and approving the expenditure and payment from the appropriation account designated “liability claims,” the sum of One Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($155,000.00) made payable to Tashari Sayers and Ascend Counsel, LLC, in full payment and satisfaction of all claims related to the civil action captioned Marquis Dominick, et al. v. City & County of Denver, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Civil Action Number 22-cv-01343-SKC-TPO.
Official status: Adopted
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
A resolution authorizing and approving the expenditure and payment from the appropriation account designated “liability claims,” the sum of One Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($155,000.00) made payable to Tashari Sayers and Ascend Counsel, LLC, in full payment and satisfaction of all claims related to the civil action captioned Marquis Dominick, et al. v. City & County of Denver, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Civil Action Number 22-cv-01343-SKC-TPO. Settles a claim involving the Denver Police Department. This item was approved for filing at the Mayor-Council meeting on 6-2-2026.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2026 | City Council | A motion offered by Council member Lewis, duly seconded by Council member Hinds, that Council Resolution 26-0822 be adopted en bloc, carried by the following vote: |
| 06/08/2026 | Council President | signed |
Full text
Official record
City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)
Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
17cca2fd0972e0d08811875d515fdb2ebf9eb3edabed29ecbb473f2cba47e27f
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.