A resolution authorizing and approving the expenditure and payment from the appropriation account designated “liability claims,” the sum of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000.00) made payable to Baumgartner Law, LLC, c/o Asher DeHart, in full payment and satisfaction of all claims related to the civil action captioned Stacie Lorraine Grant and Ariel Wolff v. City and County of Denver, which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 22-cv-2862-JLK.
Official status: Adopted
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
A resolution authorizing and approving the expenditure and payment from the appropriation account designated “liability claims,” the sum of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000.00) made payable to Baumgartner Law, LLC, c/o Asher DeHart, in full payment and satisfaction of all claims related to the civil action captioned Stacie Lorraine Grant and Ariel Wolff v. City and County of Denver, which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 22-cv-2862-JLK. Settles a claim involving the Denver Police Department. This item was approved for filing at the Mayor-Council meeting on 5-19-2026.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2026 | City Council | A motion offered by Council member Sawyer, duly seconded by Council member Watson, that Council Resolution 26-0724 be adopted en bloc, carried by the following vote: |
| 06/01/2026 | Council President | signed |
Full text
Official record
City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)
Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
1a848d897ce72309d6ce81291058a26682fe290e29b5e9b447f342913bc0edf7
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.