A resolution approving a proposed Agreement between the City and County of Denver and Dream Center Denver to occupy and provide programming at the former Globeville Recreation Center, in Council District 9.
Official status: Failed
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Approves a use agreement between the City of Denver and Dream Center Denver for $90,000.00 and for three years to occupy and provide programming at the former Globeville Recreation Center, in Council District 9 (PARKS-202582317). The last regularly scheduled Council meeting within the 30-day review period is on 5-18-2026. The Committee approved filing this item at its meeting on 4-7-2026.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2026 | Parks, Art and Culture | A motion offered by Council member Watson, duly seconded by Vice Chair Hinds, that Council Resolution 26-0471 be approved for filing, carried by the following vote: |
| 04/27/2026 | City Council | Council sat as a Committee of the Whole, commencing at 5:38 p.m., Council President Sandoval presiding, to hear speakers on Council Resolution 26-0471. Bryan "Pastor B" Sederwall spoke in favor of the resolution. Aaron Betcher, Marcus Weaver, and Scott Gilmore spoke in opposition of the resolution. Milo Valdez and Rebecca Trujillo spoke neither for nor against the resolution. Jesus Orrantia of Parks and Recreation delivered the staff report. A motion offered by Council member Gilmore, duly seconded by Council member Watson, that Council Resolution 26-0471 be adopted, failed to carry by the following vote: |
Full text
Official record
City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)
Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
169f30a6b369b5dcdaf41774abd9a7508b539312a36fc9b2ef27a46c6869a882
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.