A resolution approving and providing for the execution of a proposed Grant Agreement between the City and County of Denver and the State of Colorado Regional Transportation District (RTD) concerning the “RTD - DRCOG Surface Transportation Block Grant Central Corridor Vision and Alternatives Analysis” program and the funding therefor.
Official status: Adopted
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
Approves a grant agreement with the Regional Transportation District (RTD) for $964,000.00 (Federal Funds: $771,200.00, CCD Funds: $192,800.00) with a term of NTP + 3 Years for the Central Corridor Vision and Alternatives Analysis for the Welton St. corridor, in Council District 9 (DOTI-202683170). The last regularly scheduled Council meeting within the 30-day review period is on 3-23-2026. The Committee approved filing this item at its meeting on 2-18-2026. This item was called out at the 3-2-2026 meeting for a one-week postponement to the next regular Council meeting on 3-9-2026.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2026 | Transportation and Infrastructure | Council Resolution 26-0158 was approved by consent. |
| 03/02/2026 | City Council | Pursuant to Council Rule 3.6, Council member Lewis called out this item at the 3-2-2026 meeting for a postponement to the meeting on 3-9-2026. |
| 03/09/2026 | City Council | A motion offered by Council member Sawyer, duly seconded by Council member Watson, that Council Resolution 26-0158 be adopted en bloc, carried by the following vote: |
| 03/09/2026 | Council President | signed |
Full text
Official record
City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)
Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
0df510ce0aadcc1841148ab2b25eaed7fa6e0f5a665381d3b44ad9246c109e03
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.