26-0062 · Bill · Series of 2026 · City and County of Denver · Community Planning and Housing

A bill for an ordinance changing the zoning classification for 4631 North Josephine Street in Elyria Swansea.

Official status: Passed

Prime sponsors

Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).

Progress (from the official record)

Introduced01/27/2026 — A motion offered by Council member Alvidrez, duly seconded by Vice Chair Romero Campbell, that Council Bill 26-0062 be approved for filing, carried by the following vote:
Committee action03/09/2026 — Council sat as a Committee of the Whole, commencing at 5:46 p.m., Council Pro-Tem Romero Campbell presiding, to hear speakers on Council Bill 26-0062. Dani Slabaugh, Nola Miguel, Jesse Parris, Yessica Holguin, Selene Lopez, Katie Mckenna, Ana Varela, Angelina Torres, Claudia Hurtado, Raymunda Carreon, and Mercedes Gonzales spoke in favor of the bill. No one spoke in opposition of the bill. Edson Ibanez of Community Planning and Development delivered the staff report. A motion offered by Council member Sawyer, duly seconded by Council member Flynn, that Council Bill 26-0062 be placed upon final consideration and do pass, carried by the following vote:
Recorded action02/09/2026 — Council Bill 26-0062 was ordered published with a future required public hearing.
Recorded action03/09/2026 — signed
Recorded action03/12/2026 — signed
Current official status: PassedAs published by the Colorado General Assembly

Official summary

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

Approves a map amendment to rezone property from PUD 335 to U-RH-2.5, located at 4631 N. Josephine Street in the Elyria Swansea Neighborhood, in Council District 9. The Committee approved filing this item at its meeting on 1-27-2026.

Status timeline

Every recorded action on 26-0062, oldest first
Date	Location	Action
01/27/2026	Community Planning and Housing	A motion offered by Council member Alvidrez, duly seconded by Vice Chair Romero Campbell, that Council Bill 26-0062 be approved for filing, carried by the following vote:
02/09/2026	City Council	Council Bill 26-0062 was ordered published with a future required public hearing.
03/09/2026	City Council	Council sat as a Committee of the Whole, commencing at 5:46 p.m., Council Pro-Tem Romero Campbell presiding, to hear speakers on Council Bill 26-0062. Dani Slabaugh, Nola Miguel, Jesse Parris, Yessica Holguin, Selene Lopez, Katie Mckenna, Ana Varela, Angelina Torres, Claudia Hurtado, Raymunda Carreon, and Mercedes Gonzales spoke in favor of the bill. No one spoke in opposition of the bill. Edson Ibanez of Community Planning and Development delivered the staff report. A motion offered by Council member Sawyer, duly seconded by Council member Flynn, that Council Bill 26-0062 be placed upon final consideration and do pass, carried by the following vote:
03/09/2026	Council President	signed
03/12/2026	Mayor	signed

Full text

Official record

City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com)

Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of 2026-10-27

Verify this record

This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.

SHA-256 fingerprint

297d5f500629555e5957e27347d46a41fb18fb3633c8cfe05f601ceffe8b4895

What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.

Computed 2026-10-28 · Algorithm: SHA-256 · Canonical form: rogata-canonical-v1

Source: City and County of Denver — Legistar (denver.legistar.com) · Data as of 2026-10-27

The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.

If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.