Res 2026-099 · Resolution · 2026 · City of Commerce City · City Council

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER #26 TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO. 2022-18-PW WITH JHL CONSTRUCTORS LLC FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE E. 96TH AVENUE WIDENING FROM CHAMBERS ROAD TO TOWER ROAD

Official status: Passed

Prime sponsors

Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).

Progress (from the official record)

Official summary

Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.

The official page for this measure does not publish a summary. Its full text is linked below.

Status timeline

Every recorded action on Res 2026-099, oldest first
DateLocationAction
08/03/2026City CouncilA motion was made by Council Member Kim, seconded by Council Member Teter, that Resolution 2026-099 be adopted. VOTE:

Full text

Official record

City of Commerce City — Legistar (commerce.legistar.com)

Source: City of Commerce City — Legistar (commerce.legistar.com) · Data as of

Verify this record

This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.

SHA-256 fingerprint

b8a0bc9f085372585b644b178f7dc342ca22595ab32a2ef9edaaffa8f7c2feeb

What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.

Computed 2026-10-28 · Algorithm: SHA-256 · Canonical form: rogata-canonical-v1

Source: City of Commerce City — Legistar (commerce.legistar.com) · Data as of

The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.

If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.