designating the property at 1004 Lincoln Pl., City of Boulder, Colorado, to be known as the Beard–Stoyva House, as an individual landmark under Chapter 9-11, “Historic Preservation,” B.R.C. 1981; and setting forth related details
Official status: Second Reading
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
The official page for this measure does not publish a summary. Its full text is linked below.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent Agenda |
| 09/17/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Public Hearings |
Full text
Official record
City of Boulder — City Council meeting agendas, OneMeeting portal (bouldercolorado.primegov.com)
Source: City of Boulder — City Council meeting agendas, OneMeeting portal (bouldercolorado.primegov.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
98ee95dd8cadfacef66272e5271c88e4a37347c21e67e282df440a3c4608afbe
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.