Joint Wet Weather Monitoring and Discharge Permit Activities Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
R2026-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, EXPRESSING THE AURORA CITY COUNCIL’S SUPPORT OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, BY AND THROUGH ITS UTILITY ENTERPRISE, THE URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, D/B/A MILE HIGH FLOOD DISTRICT, THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, AND THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD REGARDING FUNDING OF JOINT WET WEATHER MONITORING AND OTHER COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT ACTIVITIES
Official status: Pass
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
The official page for this measure does not publish a summary. Its full text is linked below.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent Calendar — Resolutions |
Full text
Official record
City of Aurora — City Council meeting agendas and voting results (auroragov.org)
Source: City of Aurora — City Council meeting agendas and voting results (auroragov.org) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
35fa43c93873dc07b2450b8b5865547132ad09fec3383ea86e7a8eb1ca65d7fd
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.