Annual Reporting and Evaluation of the Tobacco, Kratom, and Age- Restricted Hemp Retail Licensing Ordinance
R2026-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO PROVIDE AN ANNUAL REPORTING AND EVALUATION OF THE TOBACCO, KRATOM, AND AGE-RESTRICTED HEMP RETAIL LICENSING ORDINANCE, AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS
Official status: Pass
Prime sponsors
- Curtis Gardner (City Council) — Sponsor
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
The official page for this measure does not publish a summary. Its full text is linked below.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 03/09/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent Calendar — Resolutions |
| 03/23/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent Calendar — Resolutions |
Recorded votes
- 03/09/2026 — City Council: “Does Council wish to continue this item to the March 23rd Council Meeting?” — the motion Pass on a vote of 10–1.
- 03/09/2026 — City Council: “Does Council wish to replace the original motion with the following substitute motion: Does Council wish to continue this item to the March 23 Council Meeting?” — the motion Pass on a vote of 9–2.
- 03/23/2026 — City Council: “Does Council wish to substitute the resolution as presented in the packet with the CM Gardner amended resolution?” — the motion Pass on a vote of 10–0.
- 03/23/2026 — City Council: “Does Council wish to approve this substituted resolution with the friendly amendment by CM Coombs?” — the motion Pass on a vote of 10–0.
Full text
Official record
City of Aurora — City Council meeting agendas and voting results (auroragov.org)
Source: City of Aurora — City Council meeting agendas and voting results (auroragov.org) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
2111a861d5ae2ce8a34ed947145294240f1f2b34b480003d448f4ea7f02af53e
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.