Opposition to Colorado Proposition 132
R2026-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, OPPOSING COLORADO PROPOSITION 132 (PENALTIES FOR FENTANYL CRIMES) AND AFFIRMING A COMPREHENSIVE, EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO ADDRESSING THE FENTANYL CRISIS
Official status: Pass
Prime sponsors
- Gianina Horton (City Council) — Sponsor
- Robert Andrews (City Council) — Sponsor
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
The official page for this measure does not publish a summary. Its full text is linked below.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent Calendar — Resolutions |
Recorded votes
- 09/28/2026 — City Council: “Does Council wish to support the approval of the Opposition to Colorado Proposition 132 resolution?” — the motion Pass on a vote of 8–2.
Full text
Official record
City of Aurora — City Council meeting agendas and voting results (auroragov.org)
Source: City of Aurora — City Council meeting agendas and voting results (auroragov.org) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
3b7f843ffc56e51efb4f8ed1e750a1fc84a6be027ee75e3c7cac1c7d863002cd
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.