A Resolution Authorizing an Agreement Between the City of Arvada and Essential Contractors, Inc. for West 60th Avenue Roadway Improvements, Sheridan Boulevard to Wolff Street, Project No.15-ST-18 in an Amount Not to Exceed $836,146.80
Prime sponsors
Sponsor information is on the official bill page (linked below).
Progress (from the official record)
Official summary
Official text — shown in English exactly as published by the official source. The official text controls.
This agenda item requests City Council consideration of a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project for roadway improvements along West 60th Avenue between Wolff Street and Sheridan Boulevard. The project includes roadway widening, addition of a parking lane, construction of new sidewalks, and driveway improvements to enhance safety, accessibility, and multimodal connectivity consistent with the City’s transportation and mobility policies. This project is part of the City’s adopted CIP and has been reviewed and coordinated internally to align with prior Council direction related to infrastructure investment and corridor improvements. Approval will allow the project to proceed into construction consistent with the approved scope, schedule, and budget. The Arvada team recommends that the City Council approve R26-008, A Resolution Authorizing an Agreement Between the City of Arvada and Essential Contractors, Inc.for West 60th Avenue Roadway Improvements, Sheridan Boulevard to Wolff Street, Project No.15-ST-18 in an Amount Not to Exceed $836,146.80.
Status timeline
| Date | Location | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2026 | City Council | Listed on the City Council agenda — Consent Agenda |
Full text
Official record
City of Arvada — City Council meetings, CivicClerk (arvadaco.api.civicclerk.com)
Source: City of Arvada — City Council meetings, CivicClerk (arvadaco.api.civicclerk.com) · Data as of
Verify this record
This record carries a fingerprint of its official content, computed by our data pipeline with the SHA-256 algorithm — a real computation over the record itself, not a badge we award ourselves. Anyone can recompute it from the official source and compare.
SHA-256 fingerprint
448220508bd4f6fa35734ca48c76f0b675af173506cdb3ebbb525e75c5952d5a
What it covers: the record exactly as the official source publishes it — its identifiers (bill number, session, jurisdiction), its official title and long title, its official summary, its status, its sponsors in published order, every recorded action, every recorded vote, and the link to each official text version — assembled in a fixed canonical form described on the How this data works page.
The fingerprint does not cover our retrieval date (the “Data as of” stamp in the source line): re-fetching unchanged official content produces the same fingerprint, while any change to the official content changes it.
If you recompute the fingerprint from the official source and get a different value, one of us is out of date — please report it through the corrections log.